some misconceptions, most children with ADHD do not
“grow out of it” as they mature into adulthood. Research studies indicate that 60 percent or more of these children continue to
have significant impairment into adulthood. Thus, poor school performance, for example, may evolve into poor job performance and
career failures. Childhood problems with disorganization and
forgetfulness may become adulthood problems, such as remembering to pay
bills on time or managing routine household tasks.
The large majority of research, media coverage and public
discussion of ADHD over the past two decades has focused on children and adolescents. Only in the past few years have we seen a significant
increase in awareness about ADHD in adults. Unfortunately, it is likely
that the large majority of adults with ADHD still remain undiagnosed and untreated.
The good news is that ADHD can be diagnosed and treated at any age.
Adults can benefit from treatment, including medication and therapy, as
much as children and adolescents. If you are an adult and have concerns
that you might have ADHD, it certainly is worthwhile to consider
pursuing a diagnostic evaluation. The risks associated with undiagnosed
and untreated ADHD in adulthood are many, including increased risk for
job and career failure, marital problems and divorce, financial problems and substance abuse.
A diagnostic evaluation can be provided by a qualified licensed
health care professional. It should be said that ADHD cannot be
diagnosed accurately from just brief office observations or from talking to the person. Clinicians will vary somewhat in the procedures and
testing materials they use; however, certain protocols are considered
essential for a comprehensive evaluation. A comprehensive diagnostic
assessment should include:
The single most important part of a comprehensive evaluation
for ADHD is a structured or semi-structured interview to provide a
detailed history of past and current behavior for the individual. This
interview allows the clinician to cover a broad range of topics, discuss relevant issues in more detail and ask follow up questions. The examiner will likely ask questions about the person’s health history,
developmental history going back to early childhood, academic history,
work history, family and marital history and social history.
Many professionals find it helpful to review old report cards
and other school records, going back to kindergarten or preschool. If
such records are available, they should be brought to the first
appointment. Copies of reports from any previous psychological testing
should also be brought to the appointment. For adults who experience
problems in the workplace, job evaluations should be brought for review
if these are available.
When possible, it is important for the clinician to interview
a significant other (spouse, other family member, parent, etc.) who
knows the person well. Many adults with ADHD report having a spotty or
poor memory of their past, particularly memories of their childhood.
They may recall specific details, but forget important events or other
facts. The person being evaluated may be asked to have his or her
parents or an adult sibling fill out a retrospective ADHD questionnaire
describing childhood behavior.
Clinical guidelines for diagnosis of ADHD are provided in the
diagnostic manual of the American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, also known
as the DSM–IV (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). For a
variety of reasons, ADHD appears to be under-diagnosed in females.
DSM–IV diagnostic criteria are not as well suited for diagnosing
ADHD in girls and women. Girls with ADHD are less likely to be
hyperactive compared to boys their age, and consequently are less
disruptive and less apt to draw attention from the adult caretakers in
their lives. The onset of ADHD symptoms generally occurs later in girls, frequently not before the middle school years. Women with ADHD are more
likely to experience co-existing depression and anxiety disorders. These gender differences should be considered when reviewing the history and
assessing current symptoms in female patients.
During an evaluation, the clinician uses the DSM–IV to
determine the extent to which the symptoms found in the diagnostic
criteria apply to the individual currently and since childhood. Other
self-report and collateral report standardized behavior-rating scales
may be used, such as the Brown ADD Scales-Adult Version and the Conners
Adult Attention Rating Scale.
The DSM–IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD were developed
based on data from children between the ages of four and 17 (Brown,
2000). Consequently, it appears that these criteria are ideally suited
for the diagnosis of children (particularly boys) with ADHD.
Unfortunately these existing criteria are not well suited for diagnosis
of ADHD in adults, and likely underestimate the true rate of ADHD in the adult population.
The DSM–IV criteria do not adequately assess cognitive
impairments associated with ADHD, particularly impairments in executive
functioning. Although the DSM–IV requires onset of some symptoms
before age seven, onset of symptoms may not be evident in some
individuals until well past that age. Impairment may not be evident in
individuals with high intelligence and good coping skills until the
person is in high school, in college, in a demanding career position, or in the demanding role of parent and household manager.
Until improved diagnostic criteria for ADHD in adults are made available, clinicians are advised to use the existing DSM–IV
criteria for guidance in diagnosis of adults. Clinicians are encouraged
to be aware of individual differences in onset and impact of ADHD
symptoms and to make an appropriate diagnosis on the basis of good
clinical judgment even when the DSM-IV criteria are not strictly met for adult patients.
Some clinicians prefer to use computerized tests of attention
as a source of additional information. These may involve, for example,
pressing a key when a letter or symbol appears on the screen. The
computerized tests are not diagnostic by themselves, but are used as a
supplement and can provide additional information useful in making a
diagnosis. Many individuals with ADHD perform well on these tests,
therefore, it should be noted that obtaining a “normal”
score does not rule out having ADHD.
Depending on the individual and the concerns being addressed,
additional psychological, neuropsychological or psychoeducational
testing may be used as needed. These tests do not diagnose ADHD directly and should not be used by themselves to evaluate for ADHD. Such tests
can provide important information about ways in which ADHD impacts
various areas of functioning for the individual, notably emotional and
intellectual functioning. In particular, psychological testing can help
determine the presence and effects of co-existing conditions.
Research has shown that 60 percent or more of individuals with ADHD have one or more co-existing conditions. The most common include
depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, substance abuse and
addictions and learning disabilities. Many coexisting conditions mimic
ADHD symptoms (distractibility, restlessness, forgetfulness, etc.) and
may be mistaken for the disorder.
When there is one or more co-existing conditions with ADHD, it is essential that all are diagnosed and treated. Failure to treat
co-existing conditions often leads to failure in treating the ADHD. If
there are indications of substance abuse, either currently or in the
past, a detailed history of substance use and abuse should be taken.
Some medical conditions (for example, thyroid problems or
seizure disorders) may cause symptoms that mimic ADHD or may co-exist
and complicate the condition. If the individual being evaluated for ADHD has not had a recent physical exam (within 6–12 months), a medical examination is recommended to rule out medical causes for symptoms. The
examining physician may also consider laboratory testing to screen for
medical conditions if specific symptoms are uncovered during the
The clinician should integrate the information that has been
collected from interviews and testing forms, complete a written summary
or report, and provide the person with diagnostic opinions concerning
ADHD as well as any other co-existing conditions. The clinician should
review treatment options and assist the individual in planning a course
of appropriate medical and psychosocial treatment intervention.
Afterwards, the clinician should communicate with the individual’s primary care providers, as deemed necessary.
Peter Jaksa, PhD, is a
licensed clinical psychologist in Chicago, Ill., and clinical director
of ADD Centers of America LLC (www.addcenters.com). He is the parenting
editor for ADDitude Magazine and serves on the Scientific Advisors
Board. He is a past president of the Attention Deficit Disorder
American Psychiatric Association (2000).
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition,
Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Brown, T.E. (Ed.) (2000).
Attention-deficit disorders and comorbidities in children, adolescents,
and adults. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Goldstein, S., & Teeter Ellison, A.
(Eds.) (2002). Clinician’s Guide to Adult ADHD: Assessment and
Intervention. New York: Academic Press.
Nadeau, K.G., & Quinn, P.O. (2002).
Understanding Women with ADHD. Washington, DC: Advantage Books.
Attention Digital Editions
Attention Magazine Archives
Advertise with CHADD